My opinion : U need to attack romans in one point, i think in one group of soliders,to win this battle. Literally u have 4 times more solider and it is logical to attack in one direction, they will eventually be exhausted,and its no matter what type of infantry u have, in this situation the key is number….
But of course that there is a solutions for Romans…..
Completely unrealistic. The Egyptians first send the chariots to open the Roman lines, and not just in the middle of the battle. The Romans had no chance against this superiority. They also have no cavalry.
If it is me the Egyptians you are dead (even with this wooden army). But out of 80 units, I take 24 pezetaroi (with sarisses), 16 units of hoplites, 14 units of Galatian swashbucklers, 10 units of heavy cavalry, 4 mounted arches, 12 units of slingers. I surround you with all my troops fairly, I post half of my skirmishers on one side, the other part facing your main line and I shoot in the back of the units located opposite, until that there is no more ammunition.
Once the two sides of your square weakened by my skirmishers I attack:
Facing your main line I leave 4 units of hoplites and 8 units of pezetaroi (with sarrises) to face, without attacking.
Behind, I leave 4 units of hoplites and 2 units of swashbucklers to face, without attacking.
On the two sides started by the skirmishers, I advance 2X4 units of hoplites simultaneously and I charge. Behind, a row of 2X6 swashbuckers swing all their javelins and charge in turn.
Then, a third line of pezetaroi (with sarisses) advance slowly to push in the whole line and sweep it.
If you use too many reserves and move your avant garde or your rear guard, I attack with the units that are opposite.
If my phalanx cannot push your flanks, I launch a cavalry charge (2 units on each flank).
AND IF I WANT, I CAN KILL YOUR GENERAL WITH SKIRMISHER.
YOU HAVE NO CHANCE AGAINST A HUMAN WHO KNOWS TO PLAY A MINIMUM.
you have 4 to 1 numerical advantage, you need to surround the Romans on all sides, and attack the weakest line first. If any side breaks, you'll be on the flank of the other inner sides. If they break you, it's much harder for them to flank you, you have more fresh troops to rotate around.
Buy Cheap Games from G2A, my Official Sponsor: https://www.g2a.com/r/sergiu-games
Use SHD code for 3% CASHBACK!
just for your info , This is more heavy for your cpu then your gpu .
40 sikh vs 10 lakh afghan
Tree tousand romans tree tousand five hundred ITS THREE THOUSAND 5 HUNDRED
Not original…
My opinion : U need to attack romans in one point, i think in one group of soliders,to win this battle. Literally u have 4 times more solider and it is logical to attack in one direction, they will eventually be exhausted,and its no matter what type of infantry u have, in this situation the key is number….
But of course that there is a solutions for Romans…..
go higher videos
Олни бомжи хули там
When you have to write a history essay on the battle of Roman Egypt. ??
How could the Egyptians won?
Non capisci niente
Gli egiziani non si vestivano così idiota
Did you get your pc as a gift from NASA?
this video is very good and dramatic it looks like a scene from a war movie definitely deserves some likes
Completely unrealistic. The Egyptians first send the chariots to open the Roman lines, and not just in the middle of the battle. The Romans had no chance against this superiority. They also have no cavalry.
The Romans must have used Samsung for controlling all those soldiers.
चक्रव्यूह से अच्छा कोई नहीं जय भारत
ooo……
These don't look remotely egyptian at all
Guess human basic tactics vs computer straight attacks was predictable.
?
Who's this game name
The graphics are great but when it comes to combat it doesn't look much different than Age of Mythology.
This is laggy as shite.
200000 Romans vs 3000 muslim and muslim wins
If they are Egyptian, then I'm Elvis Presley
Brave romans hhaahaha what a joke
We have here, 3 T O U S A N D Romans.
You made me laugh .. The one Egyptian soldier in fact equal more than 10 soldiers
seru ini mah euy
Game name
The romans were not brave
9:50 / Remove the guard mod noob
If it is me the Egyptians you are dead (even with this wooden army). But out of 80 units, I take 24 pezetaroi (with sarisses), 16 units of hoplites, 14 units of Galatian swashbucklers, 10 units of heavy cavalry, 4 mounted arches, 12 units of slingers.
I surround you with all my troops fairly, I post half of my skirmishers on one side, the other part facing your main line and I shoot in the back of the units located opposite, until that there is no more ammunition.
Once the two sides of your square weakened by my skirmishers I attack:
Facing your main line I leave 4 units of hoplites and 8 units of pezetaroi (with sarrises) to face, without attacking.
Behind, I leave 4 units of hoplites and 2 units of swashbucklers to face, without attacking.
On the two sides started by the skirmishers, I advance 2X4 units of hoplites simultaneously and I charge. Behind, a row of 2X6 swashbuckers swing all their javelins and charge in turn.
Then, a third line of pezetaroi (with sarisses) advance slowly to push in the whole line and sweep it.
If you use too many reserves and move your avant garde or your rear guard, I attack with the units that are opposite.
If my phalanx cannot push your flanks, I launch a cavalry charge (2 units on each flank).
AND IF I WANT, I CAN KILL YOUR GENERAL WITH SKIRMISHER.
YOU HAVE NO CHANCE AGAINST A HUMAN WHO KNOWS TO PLAY A MINIMUM.
What is the level ? Easy, Normaly ?
وربنا انت بتخم .. قاعد بتلعب بالرومانز وسايب المصريين مع نفسهم، تعاللنا شبرا وانت تتقطع يلا
Roma Victor!
Why dont you try Arabs led by Khalid ebn El Walid only a1000 and see how it turns out
Make the game normal, hard not easy that's boring y connot play so
you have 4 to 1 numerical advantage, you need to surround the Romans on all sides, and attack the weakest line first. If any side breaks, you'll be on the flank of the other inner sides. If they break you, it's much harder for them to flank you, you have more fresh troops to rotate around.
?????